Dimorfismo sexual morfométrico en una población de Cercosaura parkeri (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae)
Palavras-chave:
Morphometric, Lizards, Sexual Selection, Natural SelectionResumo
Sexual morphometric dimorphism was analyzed in Cercosaura parkeri. Males exhibited significantly larger values in all head-related measurements (width, length, and height), as well as in neck width and length of the neck and in radio-cubit length. These traits may be associated with increased bite force, potentially used during male–male combat and copulatory behavior. Although cephalic differences are often linked to dietary divergence between sexes—thereby reducing intersexual competition—this aspect was not assessed in the present study. Males showed a higher number of femoral pores, which suggests that they may ‘invest’ in chemical signaling to become more attractive to females, to indicate their presence in a territory, and/or to inform other males about their status and competitive ability. In contrast, females exhibited greater trunk length compared to males, which may provide increased abdominal space for carrying larger eggs. No significant sexual differences were observed in snout–vent length, limb measurements (forelimbs and hindlimbs), or tail length.
Referências
Alberts, A.C. 1993. Chemical and behavioral studies of femoral gland secretions in iguanid lizards. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 41: 255-60.
Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Anderson, R.A. & Vitt, L.J. 1990. Sexual selection versus alternative causes of sexual dimorphism in teiid lizards. Oecologia 84: 145-157.
Aragon, P.; López, P. & Martín, J. 2001. Discrimination of femoral gland secretions from familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by male Iberian rock lizards, Lacerta monticola. Journal of Herpetology 35: 346-350.
Aragon, P.; Massot, M.; Gasparini, J. & Clobert, J. 2006. Socially acquired information from chemical cues in the common lizard, Lacerta vivipara. Animal Behaviour 72: 965-974.
Ávila-Pires, T.C.S. 1995. Lizards of Brazilian Amazonia (Reptilia: Squamata). Zoologische Verhandelingen 299: 1-706.
Ayarde, H. 2018. Ambientes naturales de Tucumán. Universo Tucumano 2: 1-14.
Balestrin, R.L.; Capellari, L.H. & Ballestrin Outeiral, A. 2010. Biologia reprodutiva de Cercosaura schreibersii (Squamata, Gymnophthalmidae) e Cnemidophorus lacertoides (Squamata, Teiidae) no Escudo Sul-Riograndense, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 10: 131-139.
Bauwens, D.; Garland, T. Jr.; Castilla, A.M. & Van Damme, R. 1995. Evolution of sprint speed in lacertid lizards: morphological, physiological, and behavioral covariation. Evolution 49: 848-863.
Braña, F. 1996. Sexual dimorphism in lacertid lizards: Male head increase vs female abdomen increase? Oikos 75: 511-523.
Butler, M.A. & Losos, J.B. 2002. Multivariate sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Ecological Monographs 72: 541-559.
Cabrera, M.P.; Scrocchi, G.J. & Cruz, F.B. 2013. Sexual size dimorphism and allometry in Liolaemus of the L. laurenti group (Sauria: Liolaemidae): Morphologic lability in a clade of lizards with different reproductive modes. Zoologischer Anzeiger 252: 299-306.
Camilleri, C. & Shine, R. 1990. Sexual dimorphism and dietary divergence: differences in trophic morphology between male and female snakes. Copeia 1990: 649-658.
Carazo, P.; Font, E. & Desfilis, E. 2007. Chemosensory assessment of rival competitive ability and scent-mark function in a lizard, Podarcis hispanica. Animal Behaviour, 74: 895-902.
Carothers, J.H. 1984. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in some herbivorous lizards. The American Naturalist 124: 244-254.
Cooper, W.E. Jr. & Vitt, L.J. 1989. Sexual dimorphism of head and body size in an iguanid lizard: Paradoxical results. The American Naturalist 133: 729-735.
Cooper, W.E., Jr. & Pérez-Mellado, V. 2002. Pheromonal discriminations of sex, reproductive condition, and species by the lacertid lizard Podarcis hispanica. Journal of Experimental Zoology 292: 523-7.
Cordero, G.A.; Maliuk, A.; Schlindwein, X.; Werneburg, I. & Yaryhin, O. 2021. Phylogenetic patterns and ontogenetic origins of limb length variation in ecologically diverse lacertine lizards. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 132: 283-296.
Cox, R.M.; Skelly, S.L. & John-Alder. H.B. 2003. A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution 57: 1653-1669.
Cruz Elizalde, R.; Ramírez-Bautista, A.; Rosas Pacheco, L.F.; Lozano, A. & Rodríguez-Romero, F.J. 2020. Sexual dimorphism in size and shape among populations of the lizard Sceloporus variabilis (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae). Zoology 140: 125781.
De Meyer, J.; Irschick, D.J.; Vanhooydonck, B.; Losos, J.B.; Adriaens, D. & Herrel, A. 2019. The role of bite force in the evolution of head shape and head shape dimorphism in Anolis lizards. Functional Ecology 33: 2191-2202.
Diehl, L.S. 2007. Biologia reprodutiva de Cercosaura schreibersii (Wiegmann, 1834) (Sauria: Gymnophthalmidae) no sul do Brasil. Dissertação de Mestrado, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 42 p.
Fairbairn, D.J. 1997. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 659-687.
Feltrin, A.C. 2002. Dimorfismo sexual em Cnemidophorus lacertoides (Squamata, Teiidae) do Sul da América do Sul. Phyllomedusa 1: 75-80.
Fergusson, B.; Bradshaw, S.D. & Cannon, J.R. 1985. Hormonal control of femoral gland secretion in the lizard, Amphibolurus ornatus. General and Comparative Endocrinology 57: 371-6.
Fitch, H.S. 1970. Reproductive cycles in lizards and snakes. University of Kansas, Kansas. (Miscellaneous Publication n. 52).
Fitzgerald, L.; Cruz, F.B. & Perotti, G. 1993. The reproductive cycle and the size at maturity of Tupinambis rufescens (Sauria: Teiidae) in the Dry Chaco of Argentina. Journal of Herpetology 27: 70-78.
Goodman, B.A.; Miles. D.B. & Schwarzkopf, L. 2008. Life on the rocks: habitat use drives morphological and performance evolution in lizards. Ecology 89: 3462-3471.
Head, A.;Vaughn, P.L.; Livingston, E.H.; Colwell, C.; Muñoz, M.M. & Gangloff, E.J. 2024. Include the females: morphology-performance relationships vary between sexes in lizards. Journal of Experimental Biology 227: jeb248014.
Herrel, A.; Van Damme, R. & De Vree, F. 1996. Sexual dimorphism of head size in Podarcis hispanica atrata: Testing the dietary divergence hypothesis by bite force analysis. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 46: 253-262.
Herrel, A.; Spithoven, L.; Van Damme, R. & De Vree, F. 1999. Sexual dimorphism of head size in Gallotia galotti: Testing the niche divergence hypothesis by functional analyses. Functional Ecology 13: 289-297.
Herrel, A.; De Grauw, E. & Lemos-Espinal, J.A. 2001a. Head shape and bite performance in xenosaurid lizards. Journal of Experimental Zoology 290: 101-107.
Herrel, A.; Van Damme, R.; Vanhooydonck, B. & De Vree, F. 2001b. The implications of bite performance for diet in two species of lacertid lizards. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79: 662-670.
Heuring, W.L. & Hughes, M. 2019. It takes two: seasonal variation in sexually dimorphic weaponry results from divergent changes in males and females. Ecology and Evolution 9: 5433-5439.
Hews, D.K. 1996. Size and scaling of sexually-selected traits in the lizard, Uta palmeri. Journal of Zoology 238: 743-757.
Ibargüengoytia, N.R. 2008. Estrategias reproductivas en reptiles. In: Vidal, M.A. & Labra, A. (eds) Herpetología de Chile. Science Verlag, Santiago, Chile, pp 391-425.
Kratochvíl, L. & Frynta, D. 2002. Body size, male combat and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in eublepharid lizards (Squamata: Eublepharidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76: 303-314.
Kratochvíl, L.; Fokt, M.; Rehák, I. & Frynta, D. 2003. Misinterpretation of character scaling: a tale of sexual dimorphism in body shape of common lizards. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81: 1112-1117.
Laspiur, A. & Acosta, J.C. 2007. Dimorfismo sexual de Liolaemus cuyanus Cei & Scolaro, 1980 (Iguania: Liolaemidae) en una población de San Juan, Argentina. Revista Peruana de Biología 14: 47-50.
Lemos-Espinal, J.A.; Smith, G. & Ballinger, R.E. 2001. Sexual dimorphism in Abronia graminea from Veracruz, México. Herpetological Natural History 8: 91-93.
Ljubisavljević, K.; Urosević, A.; Aleksić, I. & Ivanović, A. 2010. Sexual dimorphism of skull shape in a lacertid lizard species (Podarcis spp., Dalmatolacerta sp., Dinarolacerta sp.) revealed by geometric morphometrics. Zoology 113: 168-174.
López, P. & Martín, J. 2005. Chemical compounds from femoral gland secretions of male Iberian rock lizards, Lacerta monticola cyreni. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C60: 632-636.
López Juri, G.; M. Chiaraviglio & Cardozo, G. 2018. Macroevolution of sexual size dimorphism and reproduction-related phenotypic traits in lizards of the Chaco Domain. BMC Evolutionary Biology 18: 186.
Martín, J. & López, P. 2006. Links between male quality, male chemical signals, and female mate choice in Iberian Rock Lizards. Functional Ecology 20: 1087-1096.
Martín, J.; López, P. & Gabirot, M. 2007. Effects of testosterone supplementation on chemical signals of male Iberian wall lizards: consequences for female mate choice. Behavioral, Ecology and Sociobiology 61: 1275-1282.
Mason, R.T. 1992. Biology of the reptilia, Vol. 18, Physiology e hormones, brain, and behavior. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
McBrayer, L. 2004. The relationship between skull morphology, biting performance and foraging mode in Kalahari lacertid lizards. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 140: 403- 416.
Molina-Borja, M. 2003. Sexual dimorphism of Gallotia atlantica atlantica and Gallotia atlantica mahoratae (Lacertidae) from the Eastern Canary Islands. Journal of Herpetology 37: 769-722.
Mouton, N. & Van Wyk, J.H. 1993. Sexual dimorphism in cordylid lizards: A case study of the Drakensberg crag lizard, Pseudocordylus melanotus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 1715-1723.
Naretto, S.; Cardozo, G.; Blengini, C. & Chiaraviglio, M. 2014. Sexual selection and dynamics of jaw muscle in Tupinambis lizards. Evolutionary Biology 41: 192-200.
Naretto, S. & Chiaraviglio, M. 2020. Factors driving sexual dimorphism and colour variability in the Achala Copper Lizard (Pristidactylus achalensis), an endemic species to the highland mountains in central Argentina. Canadian Journal of Zoology 98: 377-389.
Naretto, S.; Cabezas-Cartes, F.; López Juri, G. & Chiaraviglio, M. 2022. Intraspecific variability of bite force in Achala copper lizards in a sexual selection context: who bites harder and when and why?. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 282-292. 10.1093/biolinnean/blac034.
Olsson, M.; Shine, R.; Wapstra, E.; Ujvari, B. & Madsen, T. 2002. Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: The roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection. Evolution 56: 1538-1542.
Olsson, M.; Madsen, T.; Nordby, J.; Wapstra, E.; Ujvari, B. & Wittzell, H. 2003. Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in sand lizards. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270 (Suppl. 2): 254-256.
Pérez Mellado, V. & De La Riva, I. 1993. Sexual size dimorphism and ecology: the case of a tropical lizard, Tropidurus melanopleurus (Sauria: Tropiduridae). Copeia 1993: 969-976.
Reaney, L.T. & Whiting, M.J. 2002. Life on a limb: ecology of the tree agama (Acanthocercusa atricollis) in southern Africa. Journal of Zoology, London 257: 439-448.
Schoener, T.W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2: 369-404.
Schoener, T.W. 1977. Competition and the niche: 35-136. En: Gans, C. & Tinkle, D.W. (eds). Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 7: Ecology and behaviour A. New York: Academic Press.
Schuck, L.; Neely, W.; Farina, R.; Morales Oliveira, J. & Tozetti, A. 2021. Morphological trait variation between two populations of Cercosaura schreibersii in southern Brazil: insights on habitat-driven adaptation. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 16: 337-344.
Schwarzkopf, L. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in body shape without sexual dimorphism in body size in water skinks (Eulamprus quoyii). Herpetologica 61: 116-123.
Shine, R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. The Quarterly Review of Biology 64: 419-443.
Shine, R. 1991. Intersexual dietary divergence and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in snakes. The American Naturalist 138: 103-122.
Slatkin, M. 1984. Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 622-630.
Tedesco, M.E.; Zaracho, V.H.; Regnet, M.A.; Acosta, J.L.; Aguiar, L.D.; Etchepare, E.G.; Ruiz Garcia, J.A.; Aguirre, R.H.; Lencina, D.A. & Espínola Ocampo, D. 2023. Primeros registros de Cercosaura parkeri (Ruibal, 1952) (Sauria, Gymnophthalmidae) en la ecorregión Chaco Seco de Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetología 37 (2).
Uller, T. & Olsson, M. 2003. Prenatal sex ratios influence sexual dimorphism in a reptile. Journal of Experimental Zoology 295 A: 183-187.
Valdecantos, M.S. & Lobo, F. 2007. Dimorfismo sexual en Liolaemus multicolor y L. irregularis (Iguania: Liolaemidae). Revista Española de Herpetología 21: 55-69.
Van Sluys, M. 1993. Food habitats of the Lizard Tropidurus itambere (Tropiduridae) in Southeastern Brazil. Journal of Herpetology 27: 347-351.
Verrastro, L. 2004. Sexual dimorphism in Liolaemus occipitalis (Iguania, Tropiduridae). Iheringia, Série Zoologica 1: 45-48.
Vitt, L.J. 1982. Reproductive tactics of Ameiva ameiva (Lacertilia: Teiidae) in a seasonally fluctuating tropical habitat. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60: 3113-3120.
Winchell, K.; Carlen, E.J.; Puente-Rolón, A.R. & Revell, L.J. 2018. Divergent habitat use of two urban lizard species. Ecology and Evolution 8: 25-35.
Zamudio, K.R. 1998. The evolution of female-biased sexual size dimorphism: a population-level comparative study in horned lizards (Phrynosoma). Evolution 52: 1821-1833.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 María Paula Cabrera, Juan Carlos Stazzonelli

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obras Derivadas 4.0 Internacional
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia
Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada , brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios . Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
- No Comercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales .
- Sin Derivadas — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuir el material modificado.
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otras a hacer cualquier uso permitido por la licencia.